Confirmation-letter-to-daughter

Act 2006: discriminatory criteria (2) First

The decision of the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) invalidates the resolution of objections of 13 October 2004 by " undermine the rights enshrined in article 23 of the English Constitution of access to public function in terms equality under the principles of merit and ability ", in other words, by discrimination (see page 9 in the minutes):

TSJC Act of July 26, 2006

on pages 5 and 6 of the minutes can be read the criteria fixed Evaluation Commission, where the " particularly " can mean " the amount needed to ensure that the candidate with more seniority in the URV would be facilitated " because some candidates have done their whole career in the URV and I had less than a year and a half as Professor in the URV (or will be a drafting error ? ).

also the " research in the URV " appears as a separate criterion.

transcribe below the criteria (the emphasis are mine):

"is a contest to place of professor of University of the URV and not body, and that the contest has been submitted candidates only University lecturers in the URV, convener of the seats, the commission decides that, in each of the sections contained the selection criteria listed below shall be valued scientific path, teaching and overall management, and particular, the scientific career, teaching and management from obtaining your space professor in the URV .
1. Research (35%)
- creation of research groups
- production and quality
- obtaining resources, projects, equipment and infrastructure
- research in the URV
2. Teaching Activity (30%)
- participation in matters of Chemical Engineering
-
evaluation results - introduction of innovative pedagogies
3. Creation and management of teams and participation in university management (30%)
- charges
- managed resources / responsibilities
- participation in initiatives to improve university organization
4. Professional activities and other merits (5%) "